TerraWatch Essentials · · 9 min read

Last Week in Earth Observation: April 10, 2023

News, Analysis & Insights on All Things Earth Observation

Hey! Welcome to a new edition of ‘Last Week in Earth Observation, in which I attempt to curate the major developments in EO from the week that just passed and provide some thoughts & analysis on some of them.

Along with the usual summary of developments in EO, we are looking at: the role of technology consulting firms in the adoption of EO, the passengers in SpaceX’s upcoming rideshare launch, and some worrying climate news.


Four Curated Things

Major developments in EO from the past week


1. Financial Stuff: Funding, Contracts and More 💰


2. Strategic Stuff: Announcements and Partnerships 📈


3. Interesting Stuff: More News 🗞️

Some worrying climate news from satellite data…

The dried-up Loire River in France (Source: ESA, from the Sentinel-2 satellite)

4. Click-Worthy Stuff: Check These Out 🔗

Airbus_EMBanner

Subscribe to receive Earth observation insights!


One Discussion Point

Analysis, thoughts, and insights on some developments in EO


5. The Role of Technology Consulting Firms in the Adoption of EO

You might have seen some of the major consulting firms announce the launch of their space practice offerings over the past few weeks and months. Some of them include Deloitte, Accenture, McKinsey, EY, and KPMG among several others - I used to work at PwC's Space Practice myself back in the day. But, what is their strategy when it comes to EO? What do they want their role to be?

If you have read my stuff before, you already know my thesis on the importance of having a customer-focused, intermediary advisory layer in EO, with an objective, independent and holistic mindset.

In their classic thought pieces published recently, both Deloitte and McKinsey highlight the potential of EO as one of the major driving factors for the growth of the space industry, and they are confident they will play a role in that growth. But, how would this play out? Which layer of the EO value chain would they want to position themselves in?

The TerraWatch EO Value Chain (From Last Year’s State of EO)

You would think Application because that is typically where technology consulting companies operate, but my thesis is there might be more to it here. But, I would like to posit that the strategies of technology consulting companies across the EO value chain, could play out in one of three ways, using the simple “Build, Buy and Partner” framework.

Build

Some technology consulting firms will want to build their own in-house EO capabilities because they want to add EO to their firm’s DNA and potentially differentiate from their competition. This might make sense as most of these firms have strong data science and in some cases, geospatial capabilities, which would complement EO very well, especially if their goal is to build end-to-end EO-driven solutions for their customers (whose problems they know very well).

This is the default approach that consulting companies operate on, especially on a case-by-case basis, depending on the problem needs - using EO whenever needed but without really having an EO strategy. Some might see enough customer needs and interest to go ahead and create an EO strategy within a specific vertical, which does come with the added risk of becoming siloed. At some point in the building process, they might decide to switch to a Buy strategy, but those who start with a Build model are intent on owning their work.

As you would imagine, a Build strategy can work across the value chain - from launching their own satellites to creating proprietary end-user applications. But focusing on the Analytics, Insights and Applications segments seems to fit this approach well. Some examples of this approach in the market:

Buy

The technology consulting firms that do not want to reinvent the wheel in EO go with a Buy strategy, which typically involves acquiring a company and then incorporating its technology into its core offering. Technology licensing would also fall under Buy, especially if you imagine finding a middle ground between Build and Buy.

Firms that see enough customer demand for EO-derived products and those that cannot afford to wait (in the fear of losing out) turn to a Buy model. However, this is only a way of gaining time and postponing the Build model as most products would need to be integrated into the core offering. A Buy approach is more likely to happen on a vertical-specific basis than on a company-wide horizontal basis, although the latter could signify a complete shift in the firm’s strategy.

I expect quite a bit of M&A activity in this space in the next 3-5 years, simply due to the increasing need for the intermediary advisory layer in EO. This model is the most suitable for Analytics, Insights and Applications, especially if they have existing geospatial capabilities, but I will be curious to see the technology consulting firms take a bet on the Platform layer, just because I think they are the best fit for each other. Some examples:

Partner

This is the easiest, least risky option of the three because it is also the most obvious way for companies to test the waters for a strategy, particularly for consulting companies that are always eager to partner. Even though this comes with the added threat of wasted time and effort on both sides, consulting firms have a lot to gain from the new revenue streams that EO-related partnerships might open up, while EO companies, which are desperate for customer traction, can start evaluating their product-market fit.

I view corporate investments also as a means of executing an advanced Partner strategy, as a potential stepping stone towards a Buy in the future. While we are yet to see much activity in EO from the large consulting firms, I am quite confident that some of them will want to, or more likely, are already negotiating exclusive partnership arrangements with companies across the value chain: Data, Platform, Analytics, Insights and Applications. Some examples:


One Podcast Episode

From the TerraWatch Space podcast


6. Earth Observation for Climate Intelligence

In this episode, I am speaking with Dr Benjamin Laken, who is the Chief Science Officer at Cervest, a UK-based startup building a climate intelligence platform to support climate adaptation efforts for enterprises, governments and non-profits.

Climate risk is an important topic and satellite data has a lot to offer for estimating it. Whether it is the climate risk for an individual, an asset, an infrastructure or even an entire city, understanding the probabilities of scenarios is becoming crucial. Cervest is a company that is specifically focused on tracking, quantifying and reporting climate risk, so I thought it would be great to speak to someone who is involved in building this and understand the role of EO.

In this episode, Benjamin and I discuss Cervest and what the company is building, what their tech stack looks like, what type of satellite data they use, the challenges of using EO data, the hardest risk to measure and monitor, what the EO sector can do better, and more.


One Upcoming Launch

SpaceX Transporter-7 on April 11


7. Taking a Look at EO Satellites on SpaceX Transporter-7

The Transporter rideshare missions from SpaceX, which take place roughly once a quarter, are fun to follow because a variety of satellites from several countries get a ride to orbit. This time, the Transporter-7 mission launching on April 11 at 8.48 am GMT, is carrying at least 20 different payloads from at least 10 different countries, with quite many EO sensors.

Here’s a breakdown of the publicly announced1 EO missions on this launch, that I could find, which include some first commercial satellite launches for some companies, constellation updates for others, technology demonstrations etc. 🚀

First Commercial Launches

Constellation Updates

Technology Demonstrations

The mission also includes academic and research missions from universities, a list of which can be found here and here.


Until next week,

Aravind.


  1. Usually, there tend to be quite a few undisclosed satellites. Watch out for updates!

  2. This satellite, called Epic View, by manufacturer AAC Clyde Space, is also part of its “Space Data as a Service” offering

Read next